Tuesday, 22 March 2011

Should 'Twilight' Continue After 'Breaking Dawn'?

The Twilight films have been a phenomenal success and launched its two main stars, Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart, into mega stardom. The movies have been based on the Twilight novels written by Stephenie Meyer. However, Breaking Dawn is the last of the four book series and with the end of the novels comes the end of the film franchise, or does it?

Because there are no more books to base another film on does that mean that they shouldn't make another Twilight movie after Breaking Dawn? If another Twilight movie starred Robert Pattinson and Kristen Stewart there is no doubt that it would be successful at the box office.

Should the movie studio consider continuing the franchise after Breaking Dawn?

It is not unprecedented to continue a film franchise that was based on a novel without having another book to work from. The first two Jurassic Park films were based on two books by written by Michael Crichton. The third Jurassic Park film was not based on a book but instead was based on a screenplay that was written as a sequel to the first two movies. In the case of Jurassic Park, the third film was a disaster, but that doesn't mean that a good script couldn't be written for another Twilight movie.

What do you think?

Should the movie studio keep the Twilight film franchise going?


Should Breaking Dawn Part 2 be the last in the series?

source metrowny via allkristenstewart

No comments:

Post a Comment